A great Article and video from the Silver Doctors, Bloomberg AND
Eric Sprott, he manages 9.7 Billion hedge fund (He might know a thing or 2)
I agree A MUST WATCH!!!
http://www.silverdoctors.com/eric-sprott-western-central-banks-have-no-more-gold-only-gold-receivables/#more-17192
and from Eric Sprott's article
"Then there are all the private buyers whose purchases go unreported
and unacknowledged, like that of Greenlight Capital, the hedge fund
managed by David Einhorn, that is reported to have purchased $500
million worth of physical gold starting in 2009. Or the $1 billion of
physical gold purchased by the University of Texas Investment Management
Co. in April 2011… or the myriad of other private investors (like Saudi
Sheiks, Russian billionaires, this writer, probably many of our
readers, etc.) who have purchased physical gold for their accounts over
the past decade. None of these private purchases are ever considered in
the research agencies’ summaries for investment demand, and yet these
are real purchases of physical gold, not ETF’s or gold ‘certificates’.
They require real, physical gold bars to be delivered to the buyer. So
once we acknowledge how big the discrepancy is between the actual true
level of physical gold demand versus the annual “supply”, the obvious
questions present themselves: who are the sellers delivering the gold to
match the enormous increase in physical demand? What entities are
releasing physical gold onto the market without reporting it? Where is all the gold coming from?
There
is only one possible candidate: the Western central banks. It may very
well be that a large portion of physical gold currently flowing to new
buyers is actually coming from the Western central banks themselves.
They are the only holders of physical gold who are capable of supplying
gold in a quantity and manner that cannot be readily tracked. They are
also the very entities whose actions have driven investors back into
gold in the first place. Gold is, after all, a hedge against their
collective irresponsibility – and they have showcased their capacity in
that regard quite enthusiastically over the past decade, especially
since 2008.
If the Western central banks are indeed leasing out
their physical reserves, they would not actually have to disclose the
specific amounts of gold that leave their respective vaults. According
to a document on the European Central Bank’s (ECB) website regarding the
statistical treatment of the Eurosystem’s International Reserves,
current reporting guidelines do not require central banks to
differentiate between gold owned outright versus gold lent out or
swapped with another party.
The document states that, “reversible transactions in gold do not have any effect on the level of monetary gold regardless of the type of transaction (i.e. gold swaps, repos, deposits or loans), in line with the recommendations contained in the IMF guidelines.”6
(Emphasis theirs). Under current reporting guidelines, therefore,
central banks are permitted to continue carrying the entry of physical
gold on their balance sheet even if they’ve swapped it or lent it out
entirely."
http://www.silverdoctors.com/eric-sprott-do-western-central-banks-have-any-gold-left/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.