Think about it

What is a contract?

This was a striking comment I thought it was worth sharing.

It really brings things into perspective about our current system


http://www.silver-coin-investor.com/When-the-Contract-Has-No-Clothes.html

PatFields • 14 hours ago

"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government" (Kitchens v. Steele 112 F.Supp 383)

“Common-law cheat: the obtaining of money or property by means of a false token, symbol, or device; this being the definition of a cheat or “cheating” at common law.” State v Wilson, 72 Minn. 522, 75 N.W. 715; State v Renick, 33 Or. 584, 56 Pac. 275, 44 L.R.A. 266, 72 Am. St. Rep. 758; Black’s L.D., 2nd Ed., pg. 277 (1910)

No one can deny that tender of a mere stamp for Labor and goods fits the description of 'Cheat'. But, when made 'Legal Tender' under a unique municipal jurisdiction, 'citizens' within that jurisdiction are licensed to act 'legally', rather than 'Lawfully'. (License: permission to do that which is unlawful.)

A reading of 18 USC, Sec. 8, reveals that 'Federal Reserve Notes' are 'security of the United States' (government) and as such, are Property thereof. (Property: that which is proper to one and no other.)

So, whereas Art. IV, Sec. 3, cl. 2 of the federal Constitution allows that whatever falls under the category of US government Property is beyond Constitutional restraint, members of the federal government's polity, holding themselves to be conducting trade under federal jurisdiction, may cheat each other with 'government trade instruments'.

Contracts in government nexus (another 'Property') therefore, are within the 'law' (of their jurisdiction upon its 'citizen' members).

Solution? Get out of federal jurisdiction, then define and conduct all your affairs by and with Private Money. Voila. Contract is then completely private, between transacting parties exclusively under Common Law, with all its classically perceived meaning and powers of protection."